home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing?
/
Illusion - Is Seeing Really Believing (1998)(Marshall Media)[Mac-PC].iso
/
pc
/
illusion
/
hub_fie.cxt
/
00178_Field_frep100.txt
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1996-12-30
|
2KB
|
63 lines
The second example of the
unpredictability of binocular
effects has direct bearing on
stereopsis but involves retinal
rivalry, which we allude to in
our discussion of strabismus in
Chapter 9.
You cannot fuse this pair in the
way you can fuse other pairs,
such as the first circle
stereopairs shown earlier.
Instead, you get "retinal
rivalry"--a patchwork quilt of
vertical and horizontal areas
whose borders fade in and out
and change position.
If two very different images are
made to fall on the two retinas,
very often one will be, as it
were, turned off. If you look at
the left black-and-white square
in this diagram with the left
eye and the right one with the
right eye, by crossing or
uncrossing your eyes or with a
stereoscope, you might expect
to see a grid, or mesh, like a
window screen. Actually, it is
virtually impossible to see both
sets of orthogonal stripes
together. You may see all
vertical or all horizontal, with
one set coming into view for a
few seconds as the other fades,
or you may see a kind of
patchwork mosaic of the two, in
which the patches move and
blend in and out from one
orientation to the other, as
shown by the figure to the left.
For some reason the nervous
system will not put up with so
different simultaneous stimuli
in any one part of the visual
field--it suppresses one of
them. But here we use the word
suppress as a short way of
redescribing the phenomenon:
we don't really know how the
suppression is accomplished or
at what level in the central
nervous system it takes place.
To me, the patchy quality of the
outcome of the battle between
the two eyes suggests that the
decision takes place rather
early in visual processing,
conceivably in area 17 or 18. (I
am glad I do not have to defend
such a guess.)